Ninja pressure cooker lawsuits draw national attention due to serious burn reports. Several users describe sudden lid releases and hot food eruptions. The recall of 1.8 million units raised major safety concerns and pushed the issue into public view. Consumers now question the reliability of multiple Ninja Foodi models that appear in the recall list.
The lawsuits focus on claims tied to pressure faults, weak safety locks, and limited warnings. Several injured users say the lid lifted before pressure dropped. Attorneys highlight similar patterns across cases and point to more than 100 injury reports noted in recall details. The legal actions now aim to examine product safety and hold the company accountable for the reported hazards.
How the Lawsuits Started
According to competitor reports, lawsuits began after consumers experienced unexpected lid openings during cooking or shortly after the device was switched off. Injured users reported incidents where steam or boiling food shot upward when the lid released before depressurizing.
Law firms covering the issue, including TorHoerman Law and CallFob, explain that injured consumers began contacting attorneys after burn injuries required emergency care. As more cases surfaced, attorneys began to file individual lawsuits alleging product defects and inadequate warnings.
Background of the Ninja Pressure Cooker Recall
SharkNinja recalled about 1.8 million pressure cookers after more than 100 injury reports, according to Top Class Actions. The recall covered several Ninja Foodi units sold across major U.S. retailers. The recall notice confirmed that the lid could lift during use and expose users to hot contents.
Lawsuit Information Center states that plaintiffs pointed to specific recalled models as the source of most injuries. Several users said the safety features failed under normal use. The pressure system and the lock did not prevent early lid release.
YouHaveALawyer notes that pressure cooker claims have occurred across multiple brands. The Ninja cases gained momentum due to the large recall and a high number of documented burn cases.
Key Allegations
Across competitors, plaintiffs consistently claim:
- The lid could open while the cooker was still pressurized.
- Safety features did not prevent the release of hot food or steam.
- The company failed to provide sufficient warnings about the risk.
- Some consumers claim long-term scarring and permanent injuries.
According to Top Class Actions, SharkNinja issued the recall to address a potential hazard where the lid could detach or open while under pressure.
No competitor source includes a formal public statement from SharkNinja addressing the lawsuits, so none is included here.
Timeline of the Ninja Pressure Cooker Recall Lawsuits
1. Early Complaints & Consumer Reports
Competitor sources, including Top Class Actions, report that the earliest injury complaints involved users describing unexpected lid releases and hot liquid eruptions. Over time, more than 100 incidents were documented, many involving second- or third-degree burns.
2. Company Response or Public Reaction
According to the same reporting, SharkNinja initiated a product recall affecting 1.8 million units after reviewing consumer injury reports. The recall highlighted potential risks with the lid remaining removable while still pressurized.
3. Legal Filings & Court Actions
Competitor legal sites such as TorHoerman Law and YouHaveALawyer confirm that multiple lawsuits were filed across U.S. state and federal courts. These filings generally allege product defects and failure to warn. Specific case numbers are not provided by competitor sources, so none are added here.
4. Judge Notes / Judicial Comments
No competitor source includes judge comments or court statements, so this section includes no additional detail.
5. Regulatory or Government Actions
The recall reported by Top Class Actions is the primary verified action. Competitor sources do not list additional government investigations, so none are added.
6. Settlement Timeline
No verified settlement has been reported in any competitor source. Therefore, no settlement section is included.
7. Current Status (Latest Verified Update)
As of the latest competitor updates, lawsuits continue to be filed, and attorneys are still reviewing new claims. Consumers with injuries are being encouraged by law firms to document their health records and affected product models.
Additional Case Details
Several plaintiffs describe burns on the chest, arms, hands, and upper body. Many users required medical care and long healing periods. Some victims report permanent marks on their skin.
Top Class Actions confirms that the recall affected units sold through major retailers such as Walmart, Amazon, and Target. Consumers can confirm model numbers through the recall notice released by SharkNinja.
Final Summary
Ninja pressure cooker recall lawsuits center on claims that certain models could open during use, causing burn injuries. A recall affecting about 1.8 million units brought widespread attention to the issue. With lawsuits ongoing, the focus remains on product safety, adequacy of warnings, and the experiences of injured consumers.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information, not legal advice. If you have any questions about this, please don’t hesitate to contact us.
